Westham67
5:55 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Thats the one I read
|
Westside
5:30 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Exploding molten aluminium.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110921074747.htm
|
solidbond
5:28 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
On this day in 2011 america got a bit of its own medicine.
|
Mike Oxsaw
5:24 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Westham67 4:57 Fri Sep 11
What you are describing is a very localised reaction. How far does the metal spread once it hits, but before it penetrates the concrete?
If the aluminium in your case penetrates what I assume is the depth of a solid concrete railway sleeper, there's no reason to feel that, at the same temperature, it wouldn't also penetrate a floor of the WTC, losing a lot of energy/heat as it does.
If that were the case, then once the initial "punch-through" had occurred, whatever above remained in a molten state would pour through, so, not only would the aluminium content of the aircraft be dispersed over the area of a WTC floor, it would be further dispersed in the volume of the floor below - or floors, depending on the energy it still held hitting lower floor contents and coverings.
|
Far Cough
5:23 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Oxsaw, to be clear, I'm not saying an explosion brought the towers down, it was the structural integrity that was compromised when the plane hit the building, I was referring to Westham67's assertion, that there was an explosive reaction, which could have happened as I've described, the key word there, is COULD have, no one knows exactly do they or if they do, then I urge them to contact the 9/11 commission
|
Mike Oxsaw
5:05 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Far Cough 4:41 Fri Sep 11
Not having that. The physics just doesn't stack up.
Even all the aluminium in a 757 was smelted down and spread out evenly across only one of the floors of the trade centre (that is, none was lost outside the building or directly vaporised by the initial aircraft explosion) there would not be enough latent heat at any point of contact between the water and what would be a very thin skin of molten metal to cause an explosion.
That much water would easily be able to absorb the heat in the molten metal without having it's temperature raised to anywhere near boiling point, let alone vapourize.
It's far more likely that any "explosion" was down to the remaining floor supports all failing within milliseconds of each other.
The upper floors then acellerating under gravity would have forced out all the fire currently raging beneath them giving the appearance that something on that floor had exploded.
|
Westham67
5:01 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Plus water would be ponding on the floor if the sprinklers stayed on
|
Golden Oldie
4:59 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Farby_
Not sure what this has to do with 911, but France and Britain declared war on Germany after they kicked out the bankers, jailed a Rothschild and made freemasonry illegal while preparing to deflect the communist invasion of Europe.
This thread is about the usual suspects repeating how there are no conspiracies while citing the most illogical impossible made up state sanctioned conspiracy to justify their cognitive dissonance.
|
Westham67
4:57 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Mike Oxsaw 4:22 Fri Sep 11
Good a discussion and not abuse. You must have seen or know of aluminothermic welding site welds for rails. If the weld spills it takes the top the off of concrete down to the aggregates and it has to be repaired about 2 Kg per portion. so tons of molten aluminium could well burn through the concrete floors buildings like that wouldn't have huge thick slabs for cost and weight.
Also the floors hit would be destroyed and they have may have no escape cavities for molten aluminium. it is fluid for 15 seconds for welding but a continuous fire it will stay molten
Your thoughts on the collapse whilst I listen to cricket ?
|
Darby_
4:55 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Jews knocked down the towers AND forced Hilter to invade all those countries.
Busy, aren't they?
|
Far Cough
4:50 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
AMPUTEE ACTORS
|
Nurse Ratched
4:48 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Silverstein (SILVERSTEIN!)
|
Golden Oldie
4:46 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Here you go Nursey, just for you, possibly one of the luckiest men in New York that day who not only narrowly avoided dying in the collapse of his own building but pocketed billions in insurance for his genius last minute adjustment of his insurance scheme to include collapse from as plane hitting his buildings, you know the ones designed specifically to withstand a plane crash.
Meet Lucky Larry Silverstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4Rts5RTgBM
|
Mike Oxsaw
4:45 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Herd immunity. Those that died at the Twin Towers were simply not equipped to survive terrorism.
As a result of that cull the rest of the human race is now stronger and terrorist attacks affect them less.
Herd immunity. If it is good enough as a defence against Covid-19 it is good enough as a defence against terrorism.
|
Far Cough
4:44 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
So Swiss Mitty had a "good time" with flight attendants, knowing that maybe some of their colleagues had only a few hours before died in a horrific way?
Jimmy fucking Hill
|
Far Cough
4:41 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Oxsaw without a map showing the extent of damage to the interior of those pipes, it's pointless trying to say one way or another how the water was directed, but it's clear there was enough water to interact with molten metal and cause a violent reaction
|
Nurse Ratched
4:40 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Woo-hoo! Here they come, with their metallurgical millinery.
It's going to be a good afternoon on WHO.
|
Golden Oldie
4:38 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Free-Fall Acceleration | World Trade Center Building 7
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/free-fall-acceleration
From some tin foil hat wearing professional architects and engineers group
https://www.ae911truth.org
|
Coffee
4:36 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Swiss. 4:27 Fri Sep 11
AA have one flight attendant aged 85. Was she there? Average age must be around 50? American Advantage.
|
Swiss.
4:35 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
What I can tell you is United Airlines Flight 93 was shot down by the US.
|
Mike Oxsaw
4:34 Fri Sep 11
Re: Anniversary of 9/11
|
Far Cough 4:25 Fri Sep 11
Which would gave poured straight down the service ducts housing those pipes, flooding the basement car parks.
|
| 
